PortfoliosLab logo
RYLD vs. ^TNX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RYLD and ^TNX is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

RYLD vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.38%
69.38%
RYLD
^TNX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RYLD:

0.05

^TNX:

-0.23

Sortino Ratio

RYLD:

0.19

^TNX:

-0.18

Omega Ratio

RYLD:

1.03

^TNX:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

RYLD:

0.04

^TNX:

-0.09

Martin Ratio

RYLD:

0.18

^TNX:

-0.44

Ulcer Index

RYLD:

4.41%

^TNX:

11.33%

Daily Std Dev

RYLD:

17.17%

^TNX:

21.89%

Max Drawdown

RYLD:

-41.53%

^TNX:

-93.78%

Current Drawdown

RYLD:

-13.90%

^TNX:

-45.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYLD achieves a -7.72% return, which is significantly lower than ^TNX's -4.07% return.


RYLD

YTD

-7.72%

1M

-4.88%

6M

-4.32%

1Y

0.01%

5Y*

8.42%

10Y*

N/A

^TNX

YTD

-4.07%

1M

1.86%

6M

4.45%

1Y

-5.70%

5Y*

49.31%

10Y*

8.62%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RYLD vs. ^TNX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RYLD is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

^TNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^TNX is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RYLD vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
RYLD: 0.05
^TNX: -0.23
The chart of Sortino ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
RYLD: 0.19
^TNX: -0.19
The chart of Omega ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
RYLD: 1.03
^TNX: 0.98
The chart of Calmar ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
RYLD: 0.04
^TNX: -0.19
The chart of Martin ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
RYLD: 0.18
^TNX: -0.45

The current RYLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is higher than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYLD and ^TNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.05
-0.23
RYLD
^TNX

Drawdowns

RYLD vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, smaller than the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -93.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLD and ^TNX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-13.90%
-12.05%
RYLD
^TNX

Volatility

RYLD vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) at 9.28%. This indicates that RYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
12.57%
9.28%
RYLD
^TNX