PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RYLD vs. ^TNX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RYLD vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.34%
-0.52%
RYLD
^TNX

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYLD achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than ^TNX's 14.17% return.


RYLD

YTD

8.26%

1M

0.46%

6M

5.34%

1Y

10.91%

5Y (annualized)

3.24%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

^TNX

YTD

14.17%

1M

8.37%

6M

-0.52%

1Y

-0.61%

5Y (annualized)

20.58%

10Y (annualized)

6.69%

Key characteristics


RYLD^TNX
Sharpe Ratio1.12-0.03
Sortino Ratio1.630.12
Omega Ratio1.221.01
Calmar Ratio0.64-0.01
Martin Ratio6.72-0.06
Ulcer Index1.70%11.00%
Daily Std Dev10.23%22.98%
Max Drawdown-41.53%-93.78%
Current Drawdown-8.28%-44.98%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between RYLD and ^TNX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RYLD vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.12-0.03
The chart of Sortino ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.630.12
The chart of Omega ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.221.01
The chart of Calmar ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.64-0.03
The chart of Martin ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 6.72, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.72-0.06
RYLD
^TNX

The current RYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYLD and ^TNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.12
-0.03
RYLD
^TNX

Drawdowns

RYLD vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, smaller than the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -93.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLD and ^TNX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.28%
-11.51%
RYLD
^TNX

Volatility

RYLD vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) is 3.92%, while Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that RYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.92%
6.15%
RYLD
^TNX